Open Up
Roberto Serrano, OpenPlotter's lead developer, kindly agreed to answer a few questions about the project...
What
does "sailoog" (the name of your website and pseudonym you post under) mean?
I would like to tell a nice
story here about
some recondite indigenous language or
something similar but I cannot. I just nicked it from one of our previous and
unsuccessful projects, a marine blog system. Sailblog was taken so, playing with
logos and letters we said Hey, the Internet is full of double “o”s (google, yahoo, moodle, joomla…) so let’s be cool!
Why
did you start the openplotter project?
The financial crisis hit hard in southern Europe
and took us our jobs, our homes, our boats
and our dreams. I am from Catalonia and the only option was to go abroad to work so
I started OpenPlotter project just
as an exercise to learn English, improve my
skills programming in languages like python and use some tools
like github. But
I soon realized that I was dealing with something with real
projection and maybe a way to hit back.
We believe we should be able to equip even small
boats with high quality, affordable and robust
technology without having to rely on the big corporations.
Governments
and proprietary technologies no longer have more guarantees than real democracy
and open-source technologies so we could say that my
main motivations on
this project are ethical and political but
I can not speak by the others, perhaps we
could even disagree but who cares? This is open, this
is free, and above
all this is fun.\
How
many people work on putting openplotter together?
It is hard to say. A lot of people contribute to
software or hardware while
they are configuring the system on their boats and
then
disappear as the sailing season starts
but there is also an army of loyal
beta-testers
who follow the development closely.
To be more precise, we are currently a group of
two people coding and three people developing and testing hardware.
Navigatrix
fulfils a similar function to openplotter but on a different
platform. Are you continuing to develop navigatrix, are you putting
all your effort into openplotter, or do you intend to combine the two
into one multi-platform project?
Despite
having contributed to Navigatrix development in different ways for a
long time, I can not consider myself part of the development team.
Navigatrix has its own course and still a long road ahead.
I think both are complementary projects.
Navigatrix is focused on running all the
available nautical software on any PC computer. Its main feature is portability. You can sail on any ship with your Navigatrix
laptop and
you can even sail with Navigatrix installed on a USB stick in your
pocket and run it on any computer on board.
However OpenPlotter is focused on hardware, permanent installations
and enhanced interaction with sensors.
How
many people do you think are currently using openplotter /
navigatrix?
It is
hard to say again. Since this must be sustainable, we use free file
sharing sites and torrent downloads and we do not have an accurate
number of users or downloads. We have feedback from every continent and sea area, so I guess they could be hundreds or even thousands.
You
sell accessories which are fully supported with openplotter and are
completely transparent with the (optional) donation attached to the
"sponsoring edition" SD card. It's a fantastic business
model, but is openplotter a business, or is it still a hobby?
We believe in open source, transparency and fair business. Development
and coordination take a lot of time. We need to make some profit to
keep working on it and this is how we try to do it:
Probably all your instruments are manufactured in Asia, but
development, support and merchandising is done by third
parties who obviously increase the final
price. Retail shopping in the Asian market may be cheaper but it's also a traumatic experience due
to the lack of
product documentation
and sales support. Too
often you finally get a product that doesn't fit the promised
specifications, doesn't work properly or takes more than a
month to arrive. We try to be a filter. We do the hard work of finding reliable
providers and charge a little money for doing so.
In the coming months we
will open the "fake
shop": a cost
price online shop with all the junk and
fake products that we have gathered in
order to give them an opportunity for a second life in other projects. There
will also be a list of providers we have found unreliable to help those who can't even afford our selected products and want to fight their own way through the Asian jungle.
If
"still a hobby": What's your day job?
This model of donations/selling tested products seems to work and I
can work half time on OpenPlotter. I still need to work as freelance
web developer if I want to a living wage but at least now I
can be selective about the clients and projects I choose.
Do
you sail a boat, and if so what do you use openplotter for aboard?
My boat is gone but it is said that the best boat will be always your
friends’ boat. I have seen OpenPlotter installations in all kind of
boats.
What
features of openplotter are the most popular with users?
The headline is always OpenCPN and its plugins. Second is the SDR AIS
receiver followed by engine sensors and instrument panels. Third is "home automation" features to monitor and control your boat while you are away.
Are
openplotter users making much use of Signal K?
Not much at the moment. I think they feel that SK is just a way to
receive N2K data but then they don't know what to do with these data.
They know the basics but they don't have a sexy instrument panel or phone app to realize its power yet.
Galaxy Gear S2 driven by OpenPlotter and Signal K |
NMEA
0183 will be with
us for a long time because it is the language which GPS and AIS talks but
above all because it is the only language that OpenCPN can understand
at the moment. But NMEA
0183 is not capable of managing non strict navigation data. Many
types of sensors have begun to appear in our boats
and homes so
we need to store, manage, and show these data and
another proprietary
and limited protocol
as N2K is not an option. There
are already some SK servers on the market like OpenPlotter but I think the big change is down to SK apps developers,
OpenCPN included.
What
would make Signal K better?
Everything takes time, money, and monkeys. You need a lot from any
two groups, and a little from the third. An increase in any one
reduces the requirement for the other two. Change occurs when one of
those three change.
Moe's Law, Navigatrix team.
I think SK now needs monkeys to get to a stable version asap and to improve the documentation.
I think SK now needs monkeys to get to a stable version asap and to improve the documentation.
You
recently added MQTT support to openplotter, marrying marine data with
the mainstream IoT world. Have users reacted positively or
remained uninterested?
Yes, some of them are excited about this and they are already playing
with sensors but most of them do not have a clear idea about how they
can set up a IoT system on their boats with OpenPlotter. They need
manuals and a good documentation and we cannot offer this at the
moment since our resources are limited and we have to choose between
developing or documenting.
User-contributed MQTT-driven dashboard: http://forum.openmarine.net/showthread.php?tid=162 |
What
format are you using to publish to MQTT and why not use Signal K/JSON
objects?
OpenPlotter can send any kind of string including JSON objects over
MQTT. It is up to the subscribers to parse and manage the string. In
future OpenPlotter releases we will make building JSON
objects easier, NMEA sentences… using any navigational data.
Is
openplotter being used as a generic IoT device in non-marine
applications?
I don't know, maybe. There are a
lot of IoT home systems based on the Raspberry Pi, since OpenPlotter
is too much boats oriented, maybe it would
be better to use any of them.
What
are the future plans for the openplotter project?
We are still under construction. The main goal now is to fully implement SK in version 0.9.0 in order to be able to deal with analogue sensors (batteries, engine, tanks...) properly. We would also like to offer a good virtual instrument panel to round things off.
Once the goals are achieved, the next logic step is focus on hardware. Nowadays OpenPlotter is a project for “makers” and this always involves some skill with electronics or at least a big curiosity. We need to simplify the required devices and develop well documented hardware to make it easier for everyone to build a custom OpenPlotter system on board.
Once the goals are achieved, the next logic step is focus on hardware. Nowadays OpenPlotter is a project for “makers” and this always involves some skill with electronics or at least a big curiosity. We need to simplify the required devices and develop well documented hardware to make it easier for everyone to build a custom OpenPlotter system on board.
No comments:
Post a Comment